Patricia McCrystal
July 27th, 2015
In a bankruptcy
court ruling in Arkansas on May 25th, 2015, a debtor was forced to
forfeit his IRA’s tax-deferred status and give bankruptcy trustees access to
the IRA account assets. This ruling marked an historic turn in legal proceedings for IRA owners, as this was the first time a
creditor successfully investigated the propriety of a debtor’s IRA
transactions, and used evidence of a prohibited transaction to pierce the
bankruptcy protection that IRA account assets typically enjoy.
Debtor Barry Kellerman and his wife
Dana Kellerman created a partnership with Barry’s IRA account to purchase and develop land.
The Kellermans owned 50% of the partnership, while Barry Kellerman’s IRA owned
the other 50%. Instead of funding the purchase of the land with a proportionate
split in cash between the Kellermans and the IRA account, Barry Kellerman
directed his IRA to cover the entire purchase. The agreement required the Kellermans
to match the amount funded by the IRA account after the land was sold at some future
date.
“The Bankruptcy Court held that debtor Barry Kellerman and his
wife Dana Kellerman used the income and assets of an IRA for their benefit,
violating Internal Revenue Code Section 4975(c)(1)(D). The court found that Barry alternatively
dealt with the IRA income or assets as a fiduciary for his own interest,
violating IRC Section 4975(c)(1)(E). As
a result, the IRA lost its tax-exempt status because of prohibited transactions
engaged in by disqualified persons, and the Kellermans were unable to claim any
tax-exempt interest” (June 1 2015).
What does this mean for my IRA?
The
Kellerman court ruling is a tangible example of the consequences that can
befall IRA account holders should they fail
to exercise due diligence with their self-directed IRA investment ventures. An
IRA account administrator’s primary duty is to provide bookkeeping and custodial services
for your investment decisions as the account holder. Some providers attempt to help
clients identify potential prohibited transactions. However, an IRA provider
cannot alert an account holder about a prohibited transaction if the IRA holder does not transparently communicate their investment intentions to their
administrator.
Every self-directed IRA account provider
works from the same set of IRS rules and
codes; though these codes are not always clear. As such, IRA account holders may
wish to call their provider or attorney and provide a detailed description of
their investment ideas to make sure their proposed transactions are not
prohibited. Before moving forward with investment decisions, it’s wise for
self-directed IRA account holders to assess their own risk tolerance on
possible prohibited transactions and risky investment choices.
Education about the rules and
regulations of IRA account investments is a key aspect of making wise investment
choices. New Direction IRA emphasizes an educational business model that empowers
clients to confidently make knowledgeable assessments about potential
investment opportunities. Call New Direction IRA today for more information about self-directed IRA investment parameters and proceedings.