Friday, July 12, 2013

Case study: How not to partner with your IRA to purchase assets

A recent Wall Street Journal article outlined the case of two Colorado men whose self-directed IRA investments were deemed unlawful by the IRS after they coupled a personal line of credit with an LLC they had created with their IRAs to buy a business. The men were assessed $45,000 in penalties and approximately $225,000 in taxes each.

According to a U.S. Tax Court decision on May 9th cited in the WSJ piece:

[The] two men each used $309,000 of assets from their respective IRAs in August 2001 to buy two 50% shares in a corporation. The corporation then paid $1.1 million to buy Abbot Fire & Safety, a provider of fire alarms, sprinkler systems and related equipment. The purchase price consisted of $400,000 of the taxpayers' IRA assets, a bank loan and other funds, including a $200,000 promissory note personally guaranteed by the two men. The note was secured by their homes.”

The tax court ruled that the personally guaranteed notes constituted a prohibited transaction. The notes guaranteed by the men were considered an “indirect extension of credit,” thus forcing a termination of the IRAs when the men bought the business. Therefore, the IRS sought to collect taxes on the distribution of those IRA funds.
ira partnering, irs rules, ira prohibited transactions


Because a statute of limitations disallowed the IRS from collecting taxes when the business began in 2001, the court ruled it could only seek taxes from when the business dissolved in 2006. Those capital gains taxes amounted to $224,000 and $243,000 for the respective men.

Although this incident was unfortunate for the two men, many self-directed investors have made prohibited transactions similar to this whether they knew what they were doing or not. This case highlights the need for educating self-directed investors and finding an SDIRA provider that will be an ally throughout the investment process.

Self-directing retirement funds into alternative assets can be a powerful investment tool. When investors fail to abide by the laws, it is not an affirmation that SDIRAs are high risk or require endless amounts of paperwork to be legal. The investors in this case did not take the time to learn critical information about their IRA investment structure.

At New Direction, we have thousands of SDIRA investors that effortlessly abide by rules. As a leading provider of SDIRAs, we focus on educating investors and creating a comprehensive and complete paper trail of their transactions so that they won’t commit prohibited transactions or other illegal activities.

Think of it this way: the things in which you invest your retirement funds may be high risk; that’s your prerogative. But the self-directed IRA itself is not high risk if you’re with the right company.